MOFCOM Spokesperson’s Remarks on the U.S. Cybersecurity Advisory Warning of China-Based AI Companies’ Alleged Distillation Campaigns Targeting U.S. AI Models
Published: October 12, 2026
Sources & Verification
Primary Source
Ministry of Commerce (MOFCOM), Spokesperson's Office — Official document ↗
CPG Analysis
AI-assisted summary of the official source linked above, pending human review.
Verification
AI-assisted summary · generated Oct 12, 2026 · pending human review
This summary was generated by AI from the linked official source. It has not been reviewed line-by-line by a human editor.
⚠ This is a policy signal, not a confirmed rule.
No immediate compliance change has been identified. Monitor for official implementation documents.
⚡ Impact at a Glance
Who is affected
Artificial intelligence / large language models, cloud computing, semiconductors and computing power, cross-border software services
Cities / Agencies
Nationwide (China–U.S. AI sector) · Ministry of Commerce (MOFCOM), Spokesperson's Office
What to do now
Monitor only — no action required
Source & verification
MOFCOM · AI-assisted summary · generated Oct 12, 2026 · pending human review
What to watch next
MOFCOM: formal countermeasure announcements and export-control or unreliable-entity list notices involving U.S. AI firms; China's Intergovernmental AI Dialogue with the U.S.: meeting readouts and working-group outputs; CAC: AI model filing, algorithm registration and cross-border data flow rules; U.S. NSA/CISA/FBI: updated advisories on AI distillation; U.S. BIS/OFAC: follow-on export controls or sanctions touching AI models and compute
Executive Summary
China's Ministry of Commerce rejected a U.S. joint cybersecurity advisory (issued September 8 by the NSA, CISA and FBI) that accused Chinese AI companies of running 'industrial-scale' knowledge distillation campaigns against U.S. frontier models. MOFCOM argues distillation is a normal, neutral engineering practice used worldwide, accuses Washington of double standards and of using national security to protect a computing-power monopoly, and points out that U.S. firms also distill Chinese open-source models. Beijing says it is open to the agreed intergovernmental AI dialogue but warns it will take countermeasures if the U.S. moves to suppress Chinese AI companies over distillation.
Key Points
MOFCOM formally rejected the U.S. joint advisory by the NSA, CISA and FBI that labeled Chinese AI firms' model distillation as 'industrial-scale' campaigns against U.S. frontier models.
China argues distillation — where one AI model learns from another — is a common, neutral technical practice used by model developers worldwide, including U.S. companies, and should not be treated as a security attack.
MOFCOM accused the U.S. of double standards, noting that U.S. companies have themselves reported extensive distillation of Chinese open-source models while Washington singles out Chinese firms.
The statement claims the U.S. is using security agencies to tie private commercial interests to national security, endorsing allegedly unfair user-agreement terms and geographic restrictions imposed by some U.S. AI firms.
Beijing framed the advisory as part of a broader U.S. effort to defend a computing-power and data monopoly, citing repeated U.S. executive and legislative threats of sanctions against Chinese AI companies this year.
China said it is ready for 'constructive and professional' AI talks under the bilateral intergovernmental AI dialogue agreed by both heads of state, but warned it will 'resolutely take countermeasures' if the U.S. suppresses Chinese AI firms under the anti-distillation pretext.
Related Tools
Related Guides
AI Technology Investment Guide
Regulations and opportunities in China's AI sector.
China Data Security Law Guide
DSL compliance requirements for foreign companies.
China Data Cross-Border Transfer Guide
DSL/PIPL compliance: CAC security assessment, SCC, data localization, penalties, and FTZ pilots.